ok cool, that clarifies a lot. so the return type and organizational tools are the CF layer, and the judgment computation is still C&R.
one design question that keeps coming up for the agent: the C&R step bottoms out at “does anyone see an error.” that works well when the critic pool is diverse enough to actually catch errors. but for an agent, you’d need to think about how to compose the critic pool - like if all the critics share assumptions, you get “non-refuted” even for ideas with real flaws that a different set of critics would catch immediately.
does anything in CF’s organizational layer (MCDM, breakpoints, IGC) help with that part? like how to ensure you’re getting criticism from a wide enough range, or is that more of an open problem?