# Apricus Discussing Quitting FI in the Past

**URL:** <https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/apricus-discussing-quitting-fi-in-the-past/1733>\
**Category:** Other\
**Created:** [March 1, 2023, 10:25pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/apricus-discussing-quitting-fi-in-the-past/1733 "2023-03-01T22:25:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MetaCreation](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/metacreation/32/2670_2.png) [@MetaCreation](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/MetaCreation)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2023, 7:16pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/apricus-discussing-quitting-fi-in-the-past/1733/17 "2023-03-11T19:16:24Z")

</div>

> [@Elliot](#):
>
> She wrote intentionally misleading and provocative stuff but I don’t recall her writing something factually false if read carefully and literally. Do you have examples?

I went through looking for articles. Articles in The Fountainhead written by Dominique:  
The Riverside Drive house - page 78  
The Enright House - page 194  
A short excerpt commenting on Roark - page 208  
The Enright House, post site visit - Page 211  
Her court testimony - page 260-262 (which I’m counting as she _would_ put it in per column but gets fired instead (page 263))

To answer the question: No I don’t, I was mistaken. Misleading is accurate, I don’t recall how I had concluded “inaccurate”.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/apricus-discussing-quitting-fi-in-the-past/1733)._