# Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001
**Category:** Other
**Created:** [February 17, 2025, 8:45am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001 "2025-02-17T08:45:58Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2025, 11:23pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/28 "2025-03-08T23:23:56Z")

</div>

> [@Dface](#):
>
> Oh ok, I think since you had clarify to me this:
> 
> > [@ActiveMind](#):
> >
> > Oh, obviously “Rearden” could refer to his family members.
> 
> it mightve seen like something from your previous statement was wrong, but i dont think so.

I’m a bit confused about what you’re talking about here. “Had to clarify to me this” has grammar/typo error. Also, I think you meant “seem” instead of “seen.”

Is previous statement referring to this?

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> Whenever only “Hank” or “Rearden” is used in AS it’s actually a shorthand for “Hank Rearden”, they’re always referring to the specific person which is Hank Rearden.

If so, then at the time of writing:

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> Oh, obviously “Rearden” could refer to his family members.

I thought there was a mistake in “previous statement.” Now, without checking AS I think it’s likely true.

> [@Dface](#):
>
> Really, on the subject we’re on right now though(meta discussion?)

So meta discussion is discussion about discussion. When I was talking about whether I made an error it wasn’t meta discussion. But In these two posts we’re doing meta discussion.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001)._