# Comments on The Boyfriend's Introduction to Feminism

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/comments-on-the-boyfriends-introduction-to-feminism/2108
**Category:** Elliot Temple
**Tags:** bot, curiosity-blog
**Created:** [September 25, 2025, 7:11pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/comments-on-the-boyfriends-introduction-to-feminism/2108 "2025-09-25T19:11:21Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 210

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/elliot/32/14_2.png) [@Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Elliot)
#### Post date: [October 7, 2025, 4:06pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/comments-on-the-boyfriends-introduction-to-feminism/2108/210 "2025-10-07T16:06:19Z")

</div>

> [@anonymous45](#):
>
> The important part is that there is a breakpoint that separates guys that get a lot of likes from the rest of us.

This is a controversial premise. When you make various statements based on it, that’s called begging the question (aka assuming the conclusion). It’s generally not going to be productive to talk about issues based on this disputed premise instead of debating the premise itself.

Did you fail to recognize that many people disagree with your premise? Were you unaware of controversy? If so, that’s a sign of being in an echo chamber. If that’s not it, then there could be an issue with how you approach debate or something else going on.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/comments-on-the-boyfriends-introduction-to-feminism/2108)._