Debate about Competition

I didn’t think about the larger context of the debate. I was thinking of using a grammar tree for the debate, but I was thinking for what? Like, it doesn’t sound as useful as a debate tree.

Usually I do use grammar trees to clarify stuff for me. Clarifying stuff for yourself does sound like what’s valuable about grammar trees in general. Maybe, if the debate was about what an author meant in a novel then grammar trees would be good there to use.

Also, I could see how clearing up something important one of us wrote could be very useful. What if there’s a grammar or sentence issue holding us back? A grammar tree could help.

I wanna make a shortened version of my reply for the debate tree:

Can i say, “Don’t separate economic competition from general competition because people compete to win or lose there too.”?

I’m not sure about economic competition in my quote above, but I thought I turn it into a negative statement anyways. Also, I think my quote above is saying there’s similarities between competition in video games and the economy. I might also be saying don’t separate the two cuz that similarity is what the thesis is referring to. Here’s @Eternity’s reply to the quote:

The “winners” seem different than the winners in like a video game competition. It also seems that the losers in economic competition are winners too. They can still get business and make money. What’s the difference between economic competition and competition in like a sport or video game?