# Dface's First Impressions of a Microblog About Misquoting by ET (was: Elliot’s Microblogging)

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/dfaces-first-impressions-of-a-microblog-about-misquoting-by-et-was-elliot-s-microblogging/1943
**Category:** Other
**Created:** [July 31, 2024, 11:39pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/dfaces-first-impressions-of-a-microblog-about-misquoting-by-et-was-elliot-s-microblogging/1943 "2024-07-31T23:39:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dface](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/dface/32/3926_2.png) [@Dface](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Dface)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2024, 12:34am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/dfaces-first-impressions-of-a-microblog-about-misquoting-by-et-was-elliot-s-microblogging/1943/5 "2024-08-01T00:34:50Z")

</div>

> [@Elliot's Microblogging](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/elliots-microblogging/191/226):
>
> And it’d look intentional and easily avoidable.

I’m thinking it would look intentional because it would seem the person changing the quoted words did it on purpose.

I don’t know why it would look easily avoidable. I’m thinking because changing quoted words sounds so wrong that not much guidance is needed to know to not do it.

> [@Dface](#):
>
> **Goal:** I want to have experience engaging with a post.

I notice it’s kind of hard to engage with a post cuz there’s a lot of little things going on when reading something. Like it’s easy to mess up and misinterpret something.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/dfaces-first-impressions-of-a-microblog-about-misquoting-by-et-was-elliot-s-microblogging/1943)._