# FI Grammar Article Part 1 \[AM\]

**URL:** <https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964>\
**Category:** Mini Projects\
**Created:** [October 7, 2024, 8:28am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964 "2024-10-07T08:28:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2024, 8:28am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/1 "2024-10-07T08:28:20Z")

</div>

**Project Summary:**  
An exploration project as introduction to grammar. read part 1 of [Fallible Ideas – Grammar](https://fallibleideas.com/grammar) and do the exercises with tree diagrams as well. Intended as a sub-project as part of a regular project to do the whole article.  
**Goal:**  
Learn basic grammar.  
Practice more with tree diagrams.  
Start second project for the rest of the article. Figure out things like what resources I need for the project and what my expected error rate is.  
**Success criteria (& optional failure criteria):**

- Have read part 1
- Attempted all exercises
- Make tree diagrams for each exercise

**Big picture goal, why you want to do this, or CF relevance:**  
Learning grammar as philosophy prerequisite.  
**Plan:**  
I’ll compare my answers to other answers on the forum to check for mistakes. If I find a mistake I’ll try to explain what the mistake is and explain the alternative solution. I would like to attempt new sentences that are similar to the ones that I failed at, however I’m not sure I can find create such sentences without already knowing the solution as I did with arithmetic expressions. Other people suggesting a sentence would be useful, but not expected, the success of the project is not dependent on it.  
I will time the exercises.  
**Context:** (optional – fill out or delete the context section)  
I’m not a native english speaker. I don’t remember much grammar taught in english classes in school.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2024, 11:01am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/2 "2024-10-07T11:01:55Z")

</div>

Bonus exercises:  
The article explains some sentences during the explanations of grammar. The article says what parts of speech the words are and what modifies what, so I thought I could make tree diagrams for them more easily than also figuring out those things myself.  
I also watched [Learn grammar trees (they’re better than sentence diagrams) - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7MOFMORS1c&list=PLLclPWdf77QVRc0Pgn-ZvbJS2Fj2QyPj9&index=1)

 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/7/7bb6e062c6557d4365e28d63f8ea625873e20184.png)

 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/5/58c49162e6f8a3558bf4ef66f1ac0fcb87c0869d.png)

 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/b/bfa5e1ca0bc15e4f6215e8cd8570d777783587e0.png)

“learn” is noun to the preposition “to”, and it is also verb like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/elliot/32/14_2.png) [@Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Elliot)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2024, 3:07pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/3 "2024-10-07T15:07:27Z")

</div>

Looks like you got the general idea for the trees. “to learn” is an infinitive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2024, 5:08am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/4 "2024-10-08T05:08:40Z")

</div>

I didn’t know about infinitives, I just treated “wanted to learn” like “want to eat” in the yt video.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2024, 6:39am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/5 "2024-10-08T06:39:13Z")

</div>

Additional context: I have watched videos on grammar trees and read some forum topics of people learning grammar. I hadn’t done any exercises and I didn’t remember any solutions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2024, 6:44am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/6 "2024-10-08T06:44:50Z")

</div>

1. John is wise.  
linking verb: is  
subject: John  
complement: wise  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/b/b1092b23d3e2a1baa8a1015820bdfa3d98493b20.png)  
1 min

2. John quickly drank milk.  
action verb: drank  
subject: John  
object: milk  
adverb: quickly (modifies “drank”)  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/9/93ffbb2cbe6182155d3280a60fdc516cd4819255.png)  
1 min 30 sec

3. John likes big, fast cars.  
action verb: like  
subject: John  
object: cars  
adjectives: big, fast (both modifies “cars”)  
I think theres an implied “and”  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/b/b111f08f89063f2d66a0be71bfa645f0b7e7c81a.png)  
3 min

EDIT: At this point I stopped specifying what modified what, since I thought the trees showed this well enough.

1. John went to the new store.  
action verb: went  
subject: John  
prepositional phrase: to the new store  
preposition: to  
noun: store  
determiner: the  
adjective: new  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/a/ab1a9ac05a6068610b84007518d9dd409f9c6733.png)  
2 min 30 sec

2. The ferocious dog chased three cats over the chair.  
action verb: chased  
subject: dog  
adjective: ferocious  
object: cats  
determiner: three  
prepositional phrase: over the chair  
preposition: over  
noun: chair  
determiner: the  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/b/b9f152484b1192c35ac6c21e40588f47a2b4a77b.png)  
4 min 15 sec

I thought it made sense that numbers could be determiners, but I searched it up before i decided on it for the exercise.

1. Clever John carefully ate the very juicy steak.  
action verb: ate  
subject: John  
adjective: clever  
adverb: carefully  
object: steak  
determiner: the  
adjective: juicy  
adverb: very  
2 min 15 sec

2. John thought hard about chemistry  
action verb: thought  
subject: John  
adverb: hard  
prepositional phrase: about chemistry  
preposition: about  
noun: chemistry  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/5/5fca84efe0974b43ee0233e95d90f0de06c3aaa8.png)  
1 min 45 sec

3. John put the toy soldier in the compartment in the box on the shelf in his room.  
action verb: put  
subject: John  
object: soldier  
determiner: the  
adjective: toy  
prepositional pharse: in the compartment in the box on the shelf in his room  
preposition: in  
noun: compartment  
determiner: the  
prepositional phrase: in the box on the shelf in his room  
preposition: in  
noun: box  
determiner: the  
prepositional phrase: on the shelf in his room  
preposition: on  
noun: shelf  
determiner: the  
prepositional phrase: in his room  
preposition: in  
noun: room  
determiner: his  

8 min 45 sec

1. The delicious cake with berries unfortunately fell onto the dirty floor from the floor.  
action verb: fell  
subject: cake  
determiner: the  
adjective: delicious  
prepositional phrase: with berries  
preposition: with  
noun: berries  
adverb: unfortunately  
prepositional phrase: onto the dirty floor  
preposition: onto  
noun: floor  
determiner: the  
adjective: dirty  
prepositional phrase: from the table  
preposition: from  
noun: table  
determiner: the  
 ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/9/9be5819cd0f0ce8e3815b505b5820537654975b2.png)  
8 min 30 sec

I spent some time deciding whether “from the table” should modify “floor” or “fell”. The floor doesn’t come from the table, but the cake fell from the table. So it made more sense to me that it should modify “fell” instead.

The whole session from starting exercises to finishing them took 40 min. This doesn’t include reading the article and doing the trees I did beforehand, which I didn’t time accurately enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 4:06am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/7 "2024-10-09T04:06:47Z")

</div>

I had forgotten to add the image of the tree for this one.

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> Clever John carefully ate the very juicy steak.  
> action verb: ate  
> subject: John  
> adjective: clever  
> adverb: carefully  
> object: steak  
> determiner: the  
> adjective: juicy  
> adverb: very  
> 2 min 15 sec

 ![Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 08.25.11](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/5/5fca84efe0974b43ee0233e95d90f0de06c3aaa8.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 4:09am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/8 "2024-10-09T04:09:43Z")

</div>

Oh no I see, I put the tree here instead, and the tree to this exercise is the one I forgot.

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> John thought hard about chemistry  
> action verb: thought  
> subject: John  
> adverb: hard  
> prepositional phrase: about chemistry  
> preposition: about  
> noun: chemistry
> 
> ![](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/5/5fca84efe0974b43ee0233e95d90f0de06c3aaa8.png)  
> 1 min 45 sec

Here’s the tree for ex.7

 ![Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 08.25.16](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/2/24b5a8de2a2df8465a19e459f840a92660356e8b.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 4:45am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/9 "2024-10-09T04:45:35Z")

</div>

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> The ferocious dog chased three cats over the chair.

The only mistake I could find was that I forgot the first “the” in this sentence. It is a determiner which modifies “dog”.

To avoid mistakes like this I should look over the sentence I analyzed and check whether every word, or tree element more generally, was included.

> [@Arithmetic trees \[ActiveMind\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/arithmetic-trees-activemind/1963/6):
>
> This one didn’t just have an arithmetic mistake, I also copied the wrong number from the equation.

This mistake is similar. I think I did do checks for whether the nodes I put in the tree were correct for my arithmetic trees, perhaps I didn’t for this one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 5:02am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/fi-grammar-article-part-1-am/1964/10 "2024-10-09T05:02:59Z")

</div>

# Project conclusion

I met the success criteria. It didn’t specify correctness, but it seems I only made two mistakes.

The first mistake was in the trees before the exercises, where I didn’t know what to classify “to learn” as, I didn’t yet know about infinitives so I’ll learn about that later.  
The other mistake was forgetting a word. I can fix this by doing a check of the sentence and the tree to see if all the words are included.

I found out more about what to expect wrt resources needed and expected error rate for the rest of the article. I’ll first look at the the rest of the article when I fill out the template for the project and compare difficulty to part 1.

The main benefit is the grammar I learned. Also succeeding at another project. I thought this project was slightly harder than the last.

I can’t start the project for the rest of article yet, I’m too busy right now. I can probably start in 2-5 days.
