# Following Along Async Tutoring \[Dface\]

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/following-along-async-tutoring-dface/1948
**Category:** Other
**Created:** [August 13, 2024, 9:12pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/following-along-async-tutoring-dface/1948 "2024-08-13T21:12:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 51

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dface](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/dface/32/3926_2.png) [@Dface](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Dface)
#### Post date: [June 13, 2025, 11:00pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/following-along-async-tutoring-dface/1948/51 "2025-06-13T23:00:42Z")

</div>

Assignment from @Eternity 's [tutoring thread](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/eternity-async-tutoring/1932/199):

> [@Eternity Async Tutoring](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/eternity-async-tutoring/1932/199):
>
> Find and do some practice problems.
> 
> Here are two types you might be able to find or create yourself:
> 
> 1. Create truth table for expression like or(not(x), y)
> 2. Evaluate expression like not(and(1, 0))
> 
> There are multiple other ways the expressions can be formatted. Using other formats is fine.
> 
> Word problems will be later.

Ok i did some practice problems by asking chatgpt for some problems to practice. I checked my own solutions n asked it to see if it got the same solutions. i know sometimes the LLM’s can get things wrong tho.

> [@Eternity Async Tutoring](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/eternity-async-tutoring/1932/199):
>
> 1. Create truth table for expression like or(not(x), y)

Here it is:

 ![Screen Shot 2025-06-13 at 3.40.39 PM](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/2X/7/76f88840fff4d7f368f885db54a86035203efb71.png)

or(not(x),y) looks like it works the same way as the imply operator.

Checked my work with @Eternity and answers look the same.

> [@Eternity Async Tutoring](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/eternity-async-tutoring/1932/199):
>
> Evaluate expression like not(and(1, 0))

not(and(1,0)) is 1. The AND of 1 and 0 is 0 and the NOT of that is 1.

The answer looks the same as @Eternity 's

> [@Eternity Async Tutoring](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/eternity-async-tutoring/1932/201):
>
> Evaluating doesn’t need a table. Can you explain what the purpose of a table is or why it’s used?

I thought the tables were to help one break apart the longer expressions and make it simpler to make a truth table out of them.

I think the tables are for listing out the possible answers for the expression. Since the first expression doesn’t start with 1’s and 0’s but with variables that means there’s idk multiple inputs for those variables. Since there’s more than one input for those variables that means there’s going to be multiple answers.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/following-along-async-tutoring-dface/1948)._