# Grammar Videos and Peikoff Grammar Course \[AM\]

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/grammar-videos-and-peikoff-grammar-course-am/2005
**Category:** Projects
**Created:** [February 26, 2025, 5:34pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/grammar-videos-and-peikoff-grammar-course-am/2005 "2025-02-26T17:34:46Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/elliot/32/14_2.png) [@Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Elliot)
#### Post date: [March 1, 2025, 4:47pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/grammar-videos-and-peikoff-grammar-course-am/2005/7 "2025-03-01T16:47:04Z")

</div>

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> > 1. Coming into the room, Jack began to remove his coat.

I don’t think “coming” modifies “Jack”. I don’t think it’s telling us the type of Jack. I don’t think it’s a coming-into-the-room-Jack that began to remove his coat. I think it provides context for the whole clause and the action, not just information about Jack.

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> > A debt she can never repay.

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> is there a way to make the tree unambiguously represent the original sentence?

It’s not a sentence. It’s a fragment.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/grammar-videos-and-peikoff-grammar-course-am/2005)._