# Introductions

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/introductions/363
**Category:** Other
**Created:** [October 16, 2021, 7:12pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/introductions/363 "2021-10-16T19:12:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/elliot/32/14_2.png) [@Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Elliot)
#### Post date: [October 3, 2024, 9:28pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/introductions/363/11 "2024-10-03T21:28:24Z")

</div>

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> When I was evaluating longevity work I thought I would learn philosophy and use that be more effective than past attempts. But maybe spreading reason and Paths Forward would more effective for longevity specifically, since theres only so much one person/organization can do.

I think the decisive argument stuff is my best idea but that Paths Forward stuff is the best option for trying to cause significant change in the world. Idk if you’ve seen [A Plan to Improve the World: 20 Rational Debate Advocates](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/a-plan-to-improve-the-world-20-rational-debate-advocates/1851)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/introductions/363)._
