# Justin Does SICP

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/justin-does-sicp/96
**Category:** Friendly
**Tags:** learning, coding
**Created:** [May 15, 2021, 1:34am UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/justin-does-sicp/96 "2021-05-15T01:34:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 81

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JustinCEO](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/justinceo/32/9_2.png) [@JustinCEO](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/JustinCEO)
#### Post date: [June 8, 2021, 9:12pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/justin-does-sicp/96/81 "2021-06-08T21:12:17Z")

</div>

This table and chart reflect the number of computational steps (reflected in calls to cc) that result when invoking `count-change` with a given input

| input value to count-change | calls to cc |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 12 |
| 2 | 13 |
| 3 | 15 |
| 4 | 17 |
| 5 | 19 |
| 6 | 25 |
| 7 | 29 |
| 8 | 33 |
| 9 | 37 |
| 10 | 41 |
| 11 | 55 |
| 12 | 63 |

looks pretty linear to me though with occasionally jumps. I’m not sure if the jumps matter for Order of Growth analysis

![Exercise 1-14.numbers 2021-06-08 17-11-27](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/uploads/default/original/1X/20200e5ff6669e61660308fa4e517266861ef59f.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/justin-does-sicp/96)._