A post was merged into an existing topic: Thiamin, Vitamins and Derrick Lonsdale
2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Thiamin, Vitamins and Derrick Lonsdale
General nutrition-related comment, not specific to the Lonsdale/Thiamin discussion: I recently started supplementing with an enzyme to help me with my low carb/keto diet and some side effects of that.
My initial impression is that it’s very helpful, but I am going to give it a few weeks before I come to a solid conclusion.
saw a post on LinkedIn from Alex Epstein. His quote (which he chose as the key point/teaser to get people to watch the video) seems to be focused on social status. He didn’t pick a quote about wanting to correct misconceptions that people have about fossil fuels, change minds, use reason. He picked one talking about wanting to have a Jordan Peterson-like status such that the mainstream media can’t ignore you. I thought this was notable. It seems bad.
Paths Forward is an alternative where ideas and criticisms wouldn’t just be arbitrarily ignored because the speaker doesn’t have high enough social status. The idea is to have a norm where ideas are dealt with rationally. Epstein is trying to win an irrational game instead of pushing for a more rational system. As his hero Ayn Rand said, that is counter-productive.
On the general topic of nutrition and food additives, I wonder if anyone has looked into what the “natural flavors” in some foods are. I’ve tried to investigate and came across this (particularly relevant since Bubly drinks are what prompted me to investigate):
Basically it says nobody knows what they are. It says the FDA defines “natural flavors” in a very open-ended way, that a ton of “chemical food additives” are recognized as “natural flavors”, and that they just have to be “generally recognized as safe”. So I’m suspicious as to whether they’re good and thinking maybe they should be avoided.
I know that some things recommend avoiding “natural flavors” because they aren’t disclosed.
Related to this (hidden ingredients), did you know that most “gum base” (like in chewing gums) is plastic? If you want plastic-free gum, you have to specifically look for gums that disclose what is in their gum base and don’t use plastic.
I did not know that. Jeez. Thanks for sharing that info.
Atlas Shrugged scene with Dagny:
She noticed the particular quality of Francisco’s smile again, one night, when she sat with him and Eddie at a bonfire they had built in the woods. The glow of the fire enclosed them within a fence of broken, moving strips that held pieces of tree trunks, branches and distant stars. She felt as if there were nothing beyond that fence, nothing but black emptiness, with the hint of some breath-stopping, frightening promise . . . like the future. But the future, she thought, would be like Francisco’s smile, there was the key to it, the advance warning of its nature—in his face in the firelight under the pine branches—and suddenly she felt an unbearable happiness, unbearable because it was too full and she had no way to express it. She glanced at Eddie. He was looking at Francisco. In some quiet way of his own, Eddie felt as she did.
“Why do you like Francisco?” she asked him weeks later, when Francisco was gone.
Eddie looked astonished; it had never occurred to him that the feeling could be questioned. He said, “He makes me feel safe.”
She said, “He makes me expect excitement and danger.”
When I listened to this I realized I didn’t actually understand the difference in their reactions.
Here’s a very tentative guess that might be way off (seemed worth trying some sort of analysis though; crits welcome):
Eddie’s good but not great so he needs people like Francisco in the world existing and running things. Francisco’s existence and presence makes him feel safe for that reason - it reminds him the world is in good hands.
Dagny is great and expects to be doing great things out in the world with Francisco, so she has a different reaction that’s more adventurous.
Came across something from Covid era that made me think of the What Kind of World Do We Live In? thread. Short excerpt below
The principal at Whittier Elementary in Northwest Washington was the first to contact the fire department. Students’ smoke detectors kept chirping in the background of virtual classes. The problem seemed widespread at the elementary school of more than 300 students, and the principal sought help from the fire department on how to address the low batteries in smoke detectors.
But soon after, other school leaders across the city starting calling, too, according to Tony Falwell, fire marshal and deputy chief at the D.C. fire department. Smoke detectors in homes were disrupting classes across the city, and to Falwell — an experienced firefighter in the department’s fire prevention division — that meant that homes were more susceptible to dangerous fires.
And while the teachers heard it, the parents and students at the homes seemed so accustomed to the incessant noise that they didn’t notice it.
“As soon as you hear it, you need to address it,” Falwell said in an interview. “Because if you continue to ignore it, it just becomes background noise.”
Many people ignore constant chirping that warns them their potentially life-saving alarm isn’t working. Pretty scary. (Also, I don’t know how people could even do that - I like quiet though, and most people seem to live in much noisier environments than me).
2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Is the material from fallibleliving.com material available somewhere? No longer available via that url
In the study, which was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Schiffman and her team found that the chemicals in sucralose can affect our cells at an even deeper level by damaging our DNA.
When sucralose is broken down in the gut, our gut bacteria can transform it into a structurally similar molecule called sucralose-6-acetate. This chemical is also produced in the manufacture of sucralose and can be found in small amounts in some commercial sucralose products.
As part of their study, Schiffman and her team exposed human blood cells to sucralose-6-acetate and monitored its effects. The results did not look good.
“Sucralose-6-acetate was genotoxic in human blood cells,” Schiffman said. “Genotoxic compounds can cause breaks in DNA with microscopically visible damage to chromosomes. This can cause inflammatory diseases such as IBD and even cancer.”
I got a bill from LabCorp but I can’t tell what it’s for. It literally doesn’t say what the service was and the figure doesn’t match anything my health insurer told me. This seems odd to me. Maybe I should try sending people bills for unspecified services and see if they pay me money!
I’m disputing part of some recent health insurance claim denials and I don’t want to accidentally pay the part I’m disputing. I tried calling the number on the invoice but it was just an IVR system for paying the bill, no humans. Stuff like this is pretty broken and terrible.
Relatedly, it’s annoying how it practically takes litigation (or at least 3 rounds of administrative appeals) to get an insurance to pay on stuff, even trivial things. Insurance is less insurance and more of a right to file an administrative appeal. The whole thing is so broken.
I tried sharing some of Elliot’s animal rights articles on an Objectivist Discord where there was a pre-existing thread on the topic of animal rights & consciousness, as I thought perhaps they’d be welcome (lol @ me, I guess). Only one guy responded directly but was quite negative, even saying of the article linked below that it was “pretty empty of meaning” because he disagreed about animals = complex robots and that brains are universal classical computers. “pretty empty of meaning” seemed like a silly thing to say even if he disagrees strongly. I don’t know why people want to say stuff they disagree with is meaningless when it clearly isn’t and when they clearly understood the controversial claims being made well enough to have a harsh negative reaction to them (which indicates there was some meaning conveyed).
Continuing the discussion from Deplatforming and Censorship Examples - #75 by JustinCEO
Sorry. Don’t feel obliged to response to this either. I was a bit torn cuz I didn’t want to create unnecessary moderation work. It also appeared that I could post in the thread. Was trying to be respectful. I was hesitant to ask because I didn’t want to be demanding/expecting a reply. I should have just followed explicit instructions about where I am allowed to post until told otherwise, though. So I’ll go back to just posting here unless expressly told I can post somewhere else (which only applies to Lonsdale thread at the moment).