# Meta Discussion Analysis and Practice\[AM and Dface\]

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/meta-discussion-analysis-and-practice-am-and-dface/2012
**Category:** Other
**Tags:** learning
**Created:** [March 10, 2025, 9:48pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/meta-discussion-analysis-and-practice-am-and-dface/2012 "2025-03-10T21:48:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dface](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/dface/32/3926_2.png) [@Dface](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Dface)
#### Post date: [March 11, 2025, 7:07pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/meta-discussion-analysis-and-practice-am-and-dface/2012/6 "2025-03-11T19:07:22Z")

</div>

If meta discussion is discussion about discussion then that means there is still a discussion going on and there is still a subject. Maybe if I work on identifying the subject in each quote it will help to know if a quote counts as meta discussion.

Quote #1:

> [@Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/29):
>
> Yeah that one sorry

Im talking about a previous statement that I meant to refer to. Hmm me talking about something from the discussion sounds like meta discussion.

Quote #2:

> [@Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/29):
>
> Yeah thats what i meant.

Im talking about a correction in my grammar/spelling. The mistake made is part of the discussion where I think it already is a meta discussion. Here(the bold is the spelling/grammar mistake):

> [@Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/27):
>
> Oh ok, I think since you had clarify to me this:
> 
> > [@Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/22):
> >
> > Oh, obviously “Rearden” could refer to his family members.
> 
> it mightve **seen** like something from your previous statement was wrong, but i dont think so.

Quote #3:

> [@Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/29):
>
> I think I disagree but I dont know how to discuss this point further.

The subject is whether something from the grammar discussion counts as meta discussion or not. Something from the discussion is being discussed. That literally sounds like meta discussion.

Quote #4

> [@Atlas Shrugged Reading and Practice\[Dface\]](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/atlas-shrugged-reading-and-practice-dface/2001/29):
>
> I don’t know if the last two posts before this one were the only meta discussion posts.

I’m talking about how I don’t know if more parts of the discussion are actually meta discussion. That again sounds like discussing about the discussion.

Im gonna try what I did in this reply for earlier parts of the discussion.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/meta-discussion-analysis-and-practice-am-and-dface/2012)._