# My Experience with My Debate Policy

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/my-experience-with-my-debate-policy/2211
**Category:** Elliot Temple
**Tags:** bot, cf-article
**Created:** [May 5, 2026, 1:32pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/my-experience-with-my-debate-policy/2211 "2026-05-05T13:32:04Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/elliot/32/14_2.png) [@Elliot](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Elliot)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2026, 1:32pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/my-experience-with-my-debate-policy/2211/1 "2026-05-05T13:32:04Z")

</div>

Summary: I explain the context for why I have a [public debate policy](https://www.elliottemple.com/debate-policy) – both philosophical reasons and experiences. I talk about fallibilism, rationality and error correction. I discuss how, counter-intuitively, my debate policy saves time and energy for me. I suggest that others create debate policies. This follows my previous article, [Fallibilism, Bias, and the Rule of Law](https://criticalfallibilism.com/fallibilism-bias-and-the-rule-of-law/), which argued in favor of using written rationality policies (which has similar merits to the rule of law).

* * *
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at [https://criticalfallibilism.com/my-experience-with-my-debate-policy](https://criticalfallibilism.com/my-experience-with-my-debate-policy)