# Paragraph Trees and Pinker Video

**URL:** https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/paragraph-trees-and-pinker-video/2013
**Category:** Projects
**Tags:** learning
**Created:** [March 11, 2025, 4:11pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/paragraph-trees-and-pinker-video/2013 "2025-03-11T16:11:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/activemind/32/5560_2.png) [@ActiveMind](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/ActiveMind)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2025, 4:51pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/paragraph-trees-and-pinker-video/2013/11 "2025-03-18T16:51:02Z")

</div>

> [@Elliot](#):
>
> What does “after all” refer to? I assume it’s about some sort of doubt you mentioned earlier in this topic but I don’t know how to quickly find it.

Yes. It referred to:

> [@ActiveMind](#):
>
> So Pinker says that AI won’t necessarily have wants and goals. So you could excuse Pinker for not thinking about the freedom of AIs.

> [@Elliot](#):
>
> I don’t know of anyone making any sort of similar philosophy analysis (including without the trees and grammar parts, and including in text form not just video)

Don’t academics answer each other’s papers? What’s the difference in their analyses and this one (other than trees)?

> [@Elliot](#):
>
> PS Please put blank lines between your paragraphs.

OK. I did that when I wasn’t sure when I wanted a new paragraph or not. It’s probably just confusing for the reader.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/paragraph-trees-and-pinker-video/2013)._