Promoting Critical Fallibilism

It does suck cuz it seems like a good conversation is taking place and it would be good to be able to talk about and bring up literature on the topic.

I saw on my phone that both replies were marked as probably spam

I saw the user you were replying to wrote a lot as well. But he didn’t get marked as probable spam. What makes someone get marked like that on twitter? I see it on some posts and always asked myself why people’s opinions were getting marked as spam

He wrote the first viral post with 7k+ likes, someone asked what caused procrastination, then he replied with the long post, which I replied to. So there’s no reason for them to suspect that would be spam.

For myself these were my first two posts and I had a link in the second. I made my account almost a year ago, but even though posting a link in my second post does probably seem suspicious to a software system. creating accounts to post links is probably something spam accounts do often

So there were three things that probably had to do with marking your replies? The low amount of posts on the account, the age of the account, and the link in the second reply?

Does it matter to ask when both replies were marked as spam? Like, the first reply was ok, but when the second was made that’s what censored both.