This sentence is connected to the last. Like, even tho the quote above is true, we’re still better off to use ideas where we find no errors. Why? I think it’s cuz if we do find errors in something that means something underlying may be causing them. You might not just be failing at the goal at hand but also at other things…Idk how that has to do with using things with no errors.
I think the quote presents problems with both approaches. Like, since we’re fallible then we could be wrong about things having known or no known errors. You could be wrong about an error you found or about a thing having no errors. Why is it better to use something with no errors?
If you use something that has errors then there are downsides to that. You’re literally failing at the goal there. What are some real life examples of things with known errors? Are there upsides to using those? I think if you fix use something with errors, that’s more effort than using a thing that might work.
Edit: Last sentence is supposed to only say “fix” not “use”.