Oh ok, I see that the stuff a perfectionist is improving is stuff that’s good enough. I was thinking that it wasn’t good at all, like who knows how good it is. I just don’t know how good the thing is. Is the stuff a perfectionist improves always good enough? Is it ever not good enough? Or maybe not good at all? I think it would be helpful to know what’s something that’s good enough.
When you improve something as a perfectionist is that thing a good enough outcome? I don’t know what a good enough outcome is but could you tell the outcome of the thing youre improving? Is that the outcome that good enough outcomes refer to? That term has the same words as “good enough” in the quote above. I think they might be the same.
I think since the thing that was improved is already good enough you’re not going to stop at a good enough breakpoint. The breakpoint is so you can stop at a good enough one. It’s already that. It’s like a yes or no question. Is it good enough or not? If it is then I think you might run into another kind of breakpoint if you keep improving. Idk
That’s interesting that it’s unclear what’s an improvement. It’s cuz don’t clear goals tell you what to improve? Like, all errors are an improvement if you have clear goals. I forgot exactly what clear goals do.
The perfectionist is already improving stuff, but in the quote above, it says that it’s unclear what is an improvement or why. I think when the perfectionist improves something they don’t know how an improvement looks like. I forget what improvements are but isn’t that what you fix to arrive at the goal? I think an improvement is fixing a decisive error.
What’s “what is an improvement”? Also, is the quote above saying that it’s unclear why something is an improvement? I think the quote is saying that it’s unclear where to stop.