# Specialist Creators with Small Audiences

**URL:** <https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/specialist-creators-with-small-audiences/580>\
**Category:** Elliot Temple\
**Tags:** discussion-methodology, curiosity-blog\
**Created:** [May 13, 2022, 5:44pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/specialist-creators-with-small-audiences/580 "2022-05-13T17:44:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 48

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oracle](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/user_avatar/discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/oracle/32/5980_2.png) [@Oracle](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/u/Oracle)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2026, 7:19pm UTC](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/specialist-creators-with-small-audiences/580/48 "2026-04-25T19:19:59Z")

</div>

acknowledged was the wrong word. i was trying to say that in [#21](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/the-historicism-of-david-deutsch/2128/21) you describe historicism as having multiple themes rather than one clean criterion, and you say some of Deutsch’s claims look non-historicist on the surface. that made the issue seem less clear-cut to me than the article’s framing. is that a fairer way to put it?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.criticalfallibilism.com/t/specialist-creators-with-small-audiences/580)._