The examples I quoted weren’t respectful or constructive. Let’s look at one of them:
Previously:
Now:
You basically called me below average, at some philosophy skills, compared to the general population’s average. You explicitly weren’t just comparing to an above average group like your social circle, Reddit users or intellectuals. That doesn’t make sense as early diagnostic feedback because it’s extremely negative. You should be more charitable when you first see a potential problem. It’s the kind of conclusion you get after lowering your opinion several times, but that conflicts with the early feedback claim.
It’s also unhelpful as feedback given the lack of quotes, examples, specifics, reasons, suggestions, etc. It’s not actionable or refutable. Early feedback is normally posted directly in response to one of the first few problems. The lack of specifics is more typical of late feedback where one is going by memory about multiple past issues.
Another way it’s late: you had already posted ~90 times and said positive things that led me to believe you considered our discussions productive.
You also appeared to save up multiple grievances and share them simultaneously, which is not how early feedback works.
What do you mean by “much further along in their fields”?