Aside:
Regardless of whether the formalism is correct or ultimately useful, it is alienating. Most people will bail on the series come Episode 6. They will think that I’m trying to be a smarty-pants and that I’m not interested in solving real problems.
This is a problem. Though I’ve yet to take it seriously, I am interested in mass traffic. So, for instance, I should have a way of explaining things that makes sense to the average Joe. I should have separate streams of dependency relationships in my content which are custom to a different kind of consumer. I should have … playlists.
I have a couple of weeks basically completely free in September. My plans for this period currently look like:
- Finish Notes on Elliot’s Grammar Article.
- Refactor the stories project.
- Plan the future of the stories project.
- Read some books.
(2.) means: explain things differently; separate things by playlist; and also related to (3.) I should be setting foundations for some path on which the project scales.
Here are some playlist ideas:
• core theory (for everyone)
• analysing real-world examples
• me making stories out of representations with commentary about how this is happening
• research (not everyone will like this; this would house the formalism)
• Q&As