Advocating Public Peer Review

I criticize peer review for lacking transparency. Then I talked about friendly, private editing, which is fine, and is usually used for papers before the peer review process. Private editing is fine because no one is asked to trust that it ensured high quality. It isn’t an attempt to have the important critical discussions in private.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://criticalfallibilism.com/advocating-public-peer-review/