Thanks 
I have a much better idea of what to do now.
Here’s my current idea for what @lmf and I should do next:
- agree on the topic. @lmf’s earliest post replying to @Elliot and I is the start of @lmf and my discussion, so it’s an intuitive place to start looking for the topic / disagreement that we’re discussing. Our main points might not be so obvious, but this post seems like a good anchor.
- if @lmf and I agree on that, we can write like a main position point – e.g., the topic could be Can the USG permanently harm BTC? – @lmf’s main point might be USG cannot permanently harm BTC because the main chain can always be revived, and mine might be USG can permanently harm BTC because – if it’s money, then – it’s fiat money. something like that – maybe our main points are just USG {can, can not} harm BTC, then we add the reasons as nodes under that – this means we can easily add more than one reason, too
- We can discuss this mostly normally, but with the added goal of finding key nodes to add to the tree.