I was thinking about breaking parts of a CF article to get practice. I’m going to do that for the article Proper Knowledge:
I’m going to break the title down first. The title is the whole; Proper Knowledge is the whole. You can break stuff down in parts like by words. There’s Proper and there’s Knowledge. I don’t know if it’s reasonable to break stuff down by words. Like, is that good for something? You can try looking up the definition of the words?
If you do break down the title by words, then I think you’re breaking them down by parts of speech. Proper is a different part of speech than Knowledge. Knowledge is a noun and I think Proper is an adjective. If you’re thinking about stuff then it would be good to know about the two words. They mean different things. Proper knowledge sounds more specific than just knowledge. You can probably think about what makes knowledge proper and what doesn’t.
Automatically, I think there’s rules or specifics about proper knowledge. Like, there’s more to think about there than what just appears. I think there’s stuff to learn about to understand what proper knowledge is. I think if I was someone who didn’t read much CF or was like a normie then I would be kind of confused or not really connect the dots about the two words combined. It may seem like something one can study but doesnt choose to. It could also seem like it’s overthinking stuff. Like, it doesn’t make sense to the reader so they like brush it off.
Can you break down “Proper” and “Knowledge” down more? What else is there to break down?