Why are you spreading anti-vax stuff here? Have you researched it and think that study is good?
And do you see the problem with bringing up a different topic, which is highly controversial, and how that can be distracting and derailing? Did you think the anti-vax example was especially good and important? Are you unaware of how most people perceive it? Did you think this was really necessary?
Do you see how actually debating this would be a huge, separate topic, so bringing it up in passing won’t be effective?
Aren’t you over-generalizing? If not, that’s quite a claim and you ought to lead with your proof instead of just asserting it. Are you failing to recognize how controversial your claims are and expecting people to just accept unsourced assertions of research misconduct leveled at an opposing political faction as a whole?
More bold claims about big topics, brought up in passing despite controversy.
Are you tilted?