This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://curi.us/2579-conspiracies-are-often-unnecessary
I think this is a really good post.
I have one correction to suggest:
What was the result of Love bravely speaking out? As far as I know, basically nothing. Weinstein lost his job in 2017 and was arrested in 2018. I don’t think either journalists or law enforcement did a serious investigation in 2005 after Love’s comment. Her old comment got attention after he got in trouble.
I have not dug deep into this, but I have read that Courtney Love claims she was blacklisted/banned by the Hollywood agency CAA for that remark against Weinstein. If that’s true, it means there actually was a significant result of her speaking out, but you are right that the result was not an investigation into Weinstein. The result was that she got punished. She had a harder time working in Hollywood.
So I think this is basically an even better example than currently stated.
Thanks. I Googled it then added this sentence:
And Love says she was banned from the CAA talent agency for speaking out, so she did face retaliation that harmed her career.
And deleted this sentence:
As far as I know, basically nothing.
I really liked the “Late Adopters” section. It was a good insight that was less obvious to me than powerful people having legal and social resources the whistleblowers don’t have.
Edit: I realized “less obvious” implies it was somewhat obvious, which I don’t think it was.