The jury explicitly used weighted factors not decisive judgments (and they got it wrong, only finding her guilty of financial stuff not medical malpractice stuff. she’s going to get a much lighter sentence than she should. there were multiple reasons for getting it wrong and epistemology is one).
From Academic Epistemology - #34 by Max (I expected a special cross-reference link to show up here when I linked to this thread, but it didn’t so I’ll quote what I wrote here)