Second sentence of the paragraph im replying to:
There’s good criticism it seems. That’s better than bad criticism. What does good criticism do? It does what’s said in the quote above. One thing I notice about a good criticism is saying why something happens. When you say why something happens, you talk about reasons for something. That’s an argument. You can always make arguments like in essays to find the truth.
I think “issue/problem” is an error. Those things are causing failure at a goal. An issue wouldn’t be a problem if it couldn’t do something better I think for the goal.
Issues/problems don’t just cause failure one goal but it could be more. So that’s >=1. If the issue/problem didn’t cause failure at any goals then you wouldn’t need a criticism. The issue/problem is causing failure at 0 goals there.
I think a bad criticism would not say why an issue/problem causes failure for one or more goals. It tried but failed at doing that. You can look at a bad criticism and say, “that’s not why that issue fails at that goal.” Or “that’s not the right issue/problem that’s causing the failure at a goal.”