I’ll be doing the same type of analysis that I did with Introduction to Critical Fallibilism - #2 by ActiveMind. I read the article the day it came out.
Introduction
- fallibilist
- knowledge is tentative
- we can always improve our knowledge
- no guarantee against errors
- perfection impossible
- there can always be errors in our ideas
- mistakes are common
- we can make progress despite never reaching perfection
- this implies infinite room for improvement
- knowledge is tentative
- refutes induction and justificationism
- there have long been known problems
- more effort has gone into trying to fix them to make original theories work instead of thinking of alternatives
- CR says they can’t work (logically, I think)
- CR’s alternative is evolutionary epistemology
- we make progress and learn (improve knowledge) by error correction
- brainstorming and criticism
- conjectures and refutations
- trial and error
- critical discussion
- we make progress and learn (improve knowledge) by error correction
- there have long been known problems