Analyzing Relationship Drama Reddit Story

@Eternity this post has spoilers. Don’t read it until after you go through stuff from my earlier posts.

You should do brainstorming exercises in the future. Maybe after paragraph trees.

The hair/clothes/makeup answer is a typical one but I think it’s part of a societal bias. It omits some common stuff which makes the woman look better and the man worse. It doesn’t explain being late very well as I think you were saying regarding organization (if one person always takes 60 minutes to get ready, and another always takes 15 minutes, they can both be on time every time using a simple strategy). And it also doesn’t discuss why women spend that much time on hair/clothes/makeup.

One thing that happens is sometimes women aren’t actually late. They just spend a long time getting ready and men complain. One reason this may happen is the man and woman may start getting ready at around the same time, so the guy finishes early, then feels like he’s waiting for her. In that case, the man may have started getting ready too early.

Another thing that happens is the man doesn’t help with a bunch of stuff that both the man or woman could do. He’s waiting and complaining while she’s doing things that aren’t just for herself such as getting/preparing snacks for the whole family which she’ll be the one to bring and carry. She’s also the one who brings aspirin, moist toilettes, and a variety of other things like she often has the tickets and knows the itinerary which she planned. She’s also the one who e.g. keeps track of the food allergies of everyone in the family. Another thing men reasonably often don’t help with, but could, is dealing with the babysitter.

Even when people are unmarried with no kids, it’s reasonably common that the man is irresponsible with his health, and the woman pushes him to go to the doctor, keeps track of his medical conditions and medications for him, and also pushes him to eat healthier. If the doctor instructs the man to eat lower cholesterol, it may well be his girlfriend trying to make that happen while he often forgets or tries to cheat. (Some of these things are a lot less common with people under 25 or 30, and with unmarried and childless people. But the people in the reddit post are early 30s with 5 years of marriage behind them, so it’s likely that even without any children the woman is doing some responsible adult stuff not just youthful partying behaviors.)

I’ve described some of the “mental burden” women often face. The man writing this reddit post complained about the “mental burden” of subtracting 40 minutes from a clock time as if it were comparable to the burdens women have. That wasn’t an accident; he was using a trendy term (also called “mental load”) with a specific meaning to try to say basically “men (or at least some like me) have burdens too” and to try to claim to be a victim of a big burden comparable to how women often are (he’s using a grievance that is currently considered legitimate by a lot of people including a lot of the reddit audience – but it doesn’t actually apply to him and he’s showing his male privilege by trying to claim to have that problem when his problem is much smaller so it shows he doesn’t actually understand the size of the mental burden women are complaining about). Besides using the term “mental burden” he said it’s “mentally exhausting for me to always have to stay on top of making sure we both get ready according to plan” which is basically falsely claiming to be the oppressed woman in the relationship – he’s trying to steal her victimhood when she’s probably carrying more of the mental load than he is. If you think victimhood or feminism stuff is dumb or problematic, note that he brought it up and used its terminology and tried to apply it to himself (if the underlying stuff is wrong, and then he wrongly applies it to himself, he’s wrong twice).

Regarding unequal burdens and why women are late, you can read lots of stories on reddit that go kind of like this: “We were having a dinner party. While I was trying to get the house ready before the guests arrived, my husband decided to repair the shed in our back yard. I had asked for help but that’s what he did instead. He was avoiding helping with anything relevant so I had to do everything.”

Another typical story is “My husband has weaponized incompetence or learned helplessness. When getting ready for guests, he can’t think of any tasks to do by himself. To get any help, I have to tell him every task that he should do, one at a time. After he’s done with a task, I have to check that he did it acceptably and around half the time I have to redo it, and I have to find him and assign a next task. This applies to any sort of task related to cooking or cleaning – he won’t take initiative or learn how to do them well. This is so much hassle that it’s easier to do everything myself, which seems to be the point. He’ll then complain when I’m still putting on makeup when the first guest arrives.”

Why doesn’t the woman know how long her routine will take to get ready and start early enough? There are some reasons that doesn’t always work well. But it sounds like in this case she has been starting early enough and been consistent with how long she takes, and they’ve been on time to things. The man is trying to take credit for that and say he’s doing all the work to get her there on time, but he’s just doing a bit of communication while she’s the one who actually does hair/clothes/makeup, plus influencer stuff, plus whatever else she does that the man didn’t mention (like bringing snacks and medicine) and she apparently keeps finishing on time until this one exception on her birthday where something went wrong. But all the other times recently, it sounds like the raw facts are she started early enough and wasn’t late, but the man isn’t giving her any credit and considers her terrible at time management.

Here’s an example of a way that a woman might start early enough, but end up a little late anyway, and be blamed for it. Her stuff takes an hour. She gets ready just on time. The man was waiting and complaining for the last half hour of it instead of either helping with anything or doing better time management by planning out an activity that’d take the right amount of time so he wouldn’t be bored waiting. His complaints slow her down but she gave herself a bit of extra time for that so she manages to get ready just on time. Then she comes to the front door and he says “finally” and starts getting his shoes, coat, wallet and keys and delays her by 2 minutes. Then they get to the car and he remembers that he forgot his water bottle, so he goes back in and delays her another 3 minutes. Then they’re 5 minutes late. Then he says that she took an hour to get ready, so it’s her fault that they’re late. If only she’d been ready earlier, they would have been on time. She caused over 30 minutes of delay, while he caused only 5 minutes of delay, so their lateness is clearly her fault. He might complain on reddit about her poor time management and leave out the 5 minutes of delay that he caused since he thinks that was normal/reasonable and didn’t cause any lateness since he was ready 30 minutes early then wasted 5 minutes at the end so he still had 25 minutes of buffer left for himself. (Similarly, there could be a getting ready task she thought he was going to do. She finds out at the last minute that he didn’t do it, so she does it, but then she’s a little late and he blames her.)

And then also, the other thing I wanted to bring up is why women spend that much time on hair/clothes/makeup. How would the man like it if she didn’t do that? He wants her to do it, and would complain if she didn’t do it, but he also complains about the time it takes her to do it, and doesn’t try to be helpful and do his best to carry half the burden. He wants her to look hot, without him participating/helping, and without it taking any extra time or being an inconvenience to him. It’s kind of a milder version of the stories I’ve seen about 50’s housewives who woke up early before their husband, put on makeup, and got back in bed, every morning, so that he’d never see her without makeup (and also never be inconvenienced by waiting for her to put on makeup – she does it at a time that is hidden from him and entirely her burden just like when they were first dating and lived apart).

Men could learn more about clothes/hair/makeup and actually help her get ready competently as her girl friends no doubt could. Or they could try to maximize how much of all the other getting ready tasks they do in order to even out the load as much as possible given the hair/clothes/makeup part is fully done by the woman. They could see the woman doing hair/clothes/makeup as the bottleneck and try to take all work away from the bottleneck that doesn’t have to be done by the bottleneck. Or they could not help but not be judgmental. Or they could not help, complain, and be judgmental. Or they could blame her in a thorough way, say or imply that they the man are the rational one while women like her are fundamentally irrational, and be really aggressive and pushy about their framing.

The whole implied framing of the reddit post is that it’s another case of a rational man trying to deal with an irrational woman, and I think you and others here (and many redditors) accepted some of that while you also saw some of the man’s flaws too like him being mean. But I don’t accept the basic idea that he’s good and rational at time management while she isn’t. It seems more likely that he’s incompetent at time management, has no idea what a bottleneck is and how to handle it, doesn’t even know all the stuff she does that’s beneficial for him, isn’t approaching the issue cooperatively as a teammate to her, and takes credit for her being consistently ready on time despite him not helping much (he was just doing a small portion of the work with some communication which he decided was too much burden for him so he decided to entirely stop helping plus likely something about how he did the change misled her in this case). He’s likely equally rational or less rational than her (based on his post, I’d estimate him at below average rationality while thinking he’s well above average. Whereas based on her apparently getting ready on time a lot while also doing influencer stuff and having a jerk for a husband, and also having some success at gaining social media followers which is hard, I’d estimate her rationality a little above average. Marrying him is a bad sign but not a reason to think she’s worse than him.)

@lmf There’s more analysis FYI since you complained about the limited detail in my original post. I think it was reasonably predictable that there would be more even if you didn’t participate in the discussion, plus it’s a weird thing to complain about when I was open to discussion and also my original analysis was adequate to reach one of the typical success outcomes with you: finding a significant point of disagreement.

1 Like

Note that I was not trying to explore all possible issues or be fully even-handed. I was trying to highlight some things that I think some people don’t know or are biased against. It’s not even trying to be thorough for what one could say in her defense.

As one brief example of many things I left out, which could be said in his defense: men are socialized not to express emotions, so that oppression may help explain why they feel they have to present themselves as rational (and the people they have complaints about as irrational). They’re unable to express their emotions as emotions so they instead often express them more in the form of “rational” thoughts.

1 Like

It makes me wonder if the vast majority of people posting on that subreddit are trying to seek validation of their point of view and not just people trying to be even handed and accurately represent some situation they were a part of. Like it seems that, in general, people concerned about the truth enough to be so careful and even-handed in their description of events might be smart and thoughtful enough to be less often confused about whether they’re the asshole in a certain case. That seems to make sense to me, and means that I should expect the majority of posters in that subreddit to be unreliable narrators.

I apologize to you that I chose to post in this thread. I sincerely and strongly regret it. I had mixed feelings about whether I wanted to discuss, and I should have sorted them out before I posted.

In my quasi-defense, after I made my choice to post here, I think that the harsh things I said were more or less forced out of me. Indeed, once I wrote down my thoughts on the Reddit post and read your response, I felt like I had to add an addendum expressing my disappointment if I wanted to post it at all, because otherwise I would be implicitly sanctioning your post. And once I said that I was disappointed, the only honest way for me to answer the question you asked was to say the harsh truth. And then the only way to honestly answer the follow-up question you asked was to say another harsh truth. I didn’t foresee all that I was committing to.

I think that your coupling of fallibility to an ~unconditional openness to debate is only valid if decisive debates are truly possible and easy. I am somewhat skeptical of that (as I have said elsewhere), though for what it’s worth, I intend to test your idea at some point by challenging you to a formal debate.

Mmm. I’m just going through this thread in order so this may be covered else where, but I think he was only looking for validation here. I guess its possible he could’ve felt guilty, but I doubt it. From the way he speaks of the situation to choosing to do this on a big day like her birthday (with some already large plans made ahead of time), I think he wanted to hurt her. Some commenters on reddit recognized that, others didn’t. I think after doing that and hurting her he wanted to make sure he didn’t come off to others as a bad person. Something along the lines of “let me share this story on reddit and see how people react. their reactions are a good gauge for other people”. Maybe he got worried that his mean action went further than intended (maybe mom doesn’t get involved often, and if mom is getting involved maybe other friends and family will too, so he needs a good story to make her look bad).

Something I just thought of: As I’ve gotten older I’ve come to realize a lot of adults are pretty poor at managing their time, life, emotions, etc. (this includes me too), yet they weirdly expect better behavior from other adults. Though her lateness stuff (and its validity) is talked about later, I wonder how many of those commenting have good time management themselves? Probably not many, realistically.

Saying Elliot’s position is “utterly insane” is bad especially if you don’t want to discuss it. I think you could have stated a strong disagreement with him without saying something like that.

I think its kind of bad that you state that you have “no respect” for Elliot’s views on a topic, don’t want to talk to him about the topic, all while you are inferring it. Again these are things that could’ve been said in a different manner. I don’t think you needed to mention your lack of respect for Elliot on those topics. I think you attribute your saying that because of “harsh truths” but I don’t know.

~yeah after going through Why Does He Do That I think I like focusing on the manipulative aspect of a lot of abusers. One of the most illuminating things he shared in the book for me was when certain violent abusers say they lost control, and then he asked them “well why didn’t you kick your wife? you said you lost control, she was on the ground, you could’ve kicked her” or how he pointed out how quick people who lost control get in control when cops pull up.

He points out that abusers get a lot of people to support them because they are very good at manipulating.

Went ahead and read it. I didn’t have much to add to women being late outside of stuff like what LMD shared. Reading through this particular post I was already aware of these issues women faced and how bad a lot of men are with these, I just hadn’t made a possible connection with lateness.

Thats one thing that stood out to me as I kept reading this but no one was bringing it up so I just kind of went with it. He acted like what he was doing was crazy time management that took a lot of effort, but outside of his whole 40 minutes thing he doesn’t share anything else he does. Does he have massive calendar system and crap that he is responsible for or?

Also should I listen to this advice?:

Unreliable narrators are the default. That’s what people are usually like.

And there are other factors. You’re thinking about what kinds of posts people would write and submit. But one of the biggest issues is that Reddit is designed to show popular posts. The posts that you see are more often ones that received many upvotes and comments, so they’re a very non-random sample of the posts people write and submit.

1 Like

I don’t think he did much.

That text is written by Discourse people not me. I don’t really care. It’s fine either way.

I think you mean decisive debates which reach a topical conclusion. I don’t claim those should be fast/easy for all topics. Reaching a meta-level conclusion, including an impasse or impasse chain, can also be OK. Having some debate and reaching and stating an impasse or meta-conclusion has lots of advantages over just not debating.

EDIT: Also, I didn’t say unconditional. Rational conditions/policies can be stated/transparent. I’ve said intellectuals ought to write down debate policies, not that they should debate unconditionally. Conditions can also be added mid-debate, in response to problems, which can lead to either the conditions being met or to an ending via impasse or meta-conclusion.

It’s weird because I can’t guess the general ballpark of what @lmf dislikes. It could be DD’s poly ideas, or he might think some (also DD-influenced btw) pickup artist stuff is too misogynist, or he might think some more recent stuff I shared like this topic is too feminist/anti-misogynist, or maybe something else. I’ve said things that could offend both right-wing or left-wing people. And as I’ve said, both generically and in some particular cases, I no longer agree with all my older posts, so I also don’t know if I currently believe whatever it is that he disagrees with[1].


  1. I do know we disagree about whether the reddit post this topic is analyzing contains potential SA that merits consideration/analysis to reach a conclusion about (my claim) rather than being something that all reasonable people could promptly dismiss as non-SA (his claim, my brief rewording). I consider my claim mild and something that I’d very confidently defend in debate. That’d be different and easier than debating whether it’s actually SA or not. I can imagine reasonable debate about whether it’s SA but I’m struggling to imagine reasonable debate about whether it’s potential SA. ↩︎

Were you aware 3 months ago? If you didn’t find out recently from stuff we talked about, I’d be curious where you found out.

I don’t agree. I think I asked two mild, non-insulting questions that weren’t forceful. I think there are plenty of honest ways to express disagreement or non-sanction without being insulting. (I could say more but I don’t really think you want to talk about it.)

A mix of stuff. I’d say I’ve always been more-or-less aware of some stuff like this from media and from paying attention to the adults around me as I grew up. I just never took it seriously or thought it bad or anything like that.

I don’t know what Starbucks official gender make-up is, but at least around here it is very heavily dominated by women. The amount of times I would go work at a different Starbucks to see that I’m the only guy working there that whole week is quite often (anyone who’s working, including regular employees, can view the schedule for the whole week). Unless I have a particular thing I want to talk about, I usually just listen to people talk. I think I’m a fairly ok listener and I’m never judgemental when people share. So a lot of my female coworkers have complained of stuff like this.

As I wrote this I remember this guy: https://www.youtube.com/@JimmyonRelationships
I came across him on YouTube shorts while at work and started going through a lot of his stuff (past year or so). I like his content and think its good. He covers various things related to relationships.

1 Like

She has a decent following on Instagram and is looking to grow as a “content creator.” I find it really silly how she turns everything we do into a photo session, and at this point, I’ve stopped agreeing to take her photos altogether.

He doesn’t respect her hobby. To her it’s probably important and very fun. It’s normal to forget other things when you’re doing fun things.

We’ve had several conversations about this. I’ve told her that it’s mentally exhausting for me to always have to stay on top of making sure we both get ready according to plan. But she never really does anything to address it.

I think it’s unfair that he has to take all the burden when it’s exhausting for him. So they should solve this conflict somehow, it shouldn’t go on as it has. It seems their conversations weren’t productive though.

This month alone, we’ve been embarrassingly late to events 2 times, and this time was the first she realized I hadn’t been honest about the timing because I used to give her an ETA 40 minutes earlier. A week ago, I told her I wouldn’t be doing that anymore and that I expected her to act like an adult and be more responsible.

He shouldn’t try to solve it by being dishonest. It’s especially bad to be dishonest in a relationship.

This time, as I’d already told her before, I didn’t give her the extra 40-minute buffer. I expected her to remember our conversation and store that information in her head to plan accordingly. Instead, she did her whole influencer routine—decorating our room, setting up studio lights, dressing up, and taking photos.

She did her routine, which is what she usually always does, i.e., it’s a habit to her. He’s expecting her to change up her habit immediately. I think that’s unreasonable, it can be hard to change habits. He should help her in changing the habit, if she also agrees to it, which I think she should since it’s currently unfair on him. But she would need some practice, she could also learn to set alarms for the events.

He didn’t say anything about whether she agreed that she should also remember to get ready for events. It might be that she agrees but just can’t remember. She might not be intentionally putting the burden on him, she might want to change but forgets anyway.
You remember the things that you think are important. She would’ve remembered if she thought it was really important to respect her husband’s time and effort. Although she did forget the concert which she really cared about. That’s probably because she was still on the habit of relying on her husband though. So it might just be that the habit is so automated and that she is really captivated when doing her routine that she forgets even though she cares.

People don’t expect to be treated harshly on their birthday either. She might be extra relaxed because it’s her birthday. I think it’s extra bad to do this on her birthday.

This time, I wanted her to experience the consequences of her actions.

She said it seemed like I was liking the rise it got from her and asked why I couldn’t set my “ego” aside for one day.

He didn’t say that he wanted revenge, but I suspect he did want revenge. He might not realise that himself, but he was okay with being dishonest to her, so he could be dishonest with himself. He might just think that this is the only way for her to change her behaviour, without having malicious intent. But he didn’t seem very sorry that she would have to experience this, which he would have felt if he thought it was a necessary evil.

I don’t think it would be necessary for her to experience the consequences either. There is some way that they could resolve the conflict without her having to suffer. He shouldn’t have to suffer too long either. But I think there would be a way to resolve this between two events.

I’m not sure what she means by “ego”, him wanting revenge?


What he did was not for the best of the relationship. Being dishonest and making her suffer will only create resentment from her, make her trust him less, think he doesn’t want the best for her, etc.

It is unfair from her to put all the burden on him when he gets exhausted by it, but I would give the benefit of the doubt to her regarding wanting to change. I think this is a typical relationship problem that could be solved cooperatively. So I wouldn’t say it’s enough to be ESH. I don’t think I would give the benefit of the doubt to him regarding wanting revenge though. I think he would have made an exception on her birthday to see her favourite artists if he didn’t want revenge. Even if he didn’t have malicious intent, and “wanted her to experience the consequences of her actions” because of lack of knowledge of how to solve the problem, I still think YTA.

I think intentions matter regarding morality, but I don’t think good intentions justify anything. Lacking knowledge causes people to suffer. There’s some things which are reasonable to expect to know. If your support of a political ideology causes millions of deaths then I don’t think your ignorance of political philosophy would make you innocent. I’m not sure what differentiates when ignorance of moral knowledge is excusable and when it’s not.


I’ll read other replies tomorrow.

I also think she partially deserves the consequences. I think being on time is something that is a personal responsibility. If in a relationship the other partner is ok with taking the burden and letting the other one be dependent then that could work, but he wasn’t ok with it. She was being irrational and dependent and faces consequences because of that, but still he should have acted differently.