Not that I know of. I think it would be a good project for me to begin on, though. But, I don’t think there is anything that I or anyone else could argue that would give you or any other CR proponent absolute certainty that things will maintain their identities. The question is “is it reasonable to think that A will always be A?” Indeed, that will be impossible if there is no acknowledgment from CR that “A is A” just to begin with. Without an axiom it becomes circular and I’m not sure where to start. Just the concept of falsifiability seems to be unfalsifiable. But that would contradict itself. So, asking me to show how induction is correct is like me asking you to show how “falsifiability” can be falsified. I am not sure of the way to proceed from here, or even if there is a way.