It should lead to value free speech,
Value → valuing. Gerund instead of noun right?
It should lead to value free speech,
Value → valuing. Gerund instead of noun right?
If you can’t give a counter-argument, you’re allegedly suppose to concede the debate and change your mind.
Suppose → supposed.
You intentionally and conscious looked for errors as part of the learning process.
Conscious → consciously.
instead of actually challenging each appropriately.
Each other?
Objectivism also cares about rationality but doesn’t actually try to study and analyze as much as Less Wrong and also broadly isn’t open to debate or free speech discussion either.
Objectivism → Objectivists?
most intellectuals seem to think of debates as something that happen in voice,
happen → happens.
Objectivism also cares about rationality but Objectivists don’t’t
You repeat a phrase in Patterns, Similarity and Relevance :
they’re not a special case not a special case.
Sharing with permission from the forum chatroom, re Curiosity – The Injustice of Strictly and Literally Making Victims Whole, Such as All Children
< Curiosity – Comments on The Boyfriend's Introduction to Feminism >
“patriarchy” not “the tatriarchy”
DKH instead of KDH in 2nd paragraph of KDH post
Bolding in quote is mine:
A million intellectuals have time to investigate over a million ideas. My view is that people should pay more attention to which ideas are have already received engagement.
I think the “are” should be deleted